“And they deny the power of God, the Holy One of Israel; and they say unto the people: Hearken unto us, and hear ye our precept; for behold there is no God today, for the Lord and the Redeemer hath done his work, and he hath given his power unto men;”
The defect Nephi terms “deny the power of God” is an interesting matter to ponder. What do you suppose denying that power involves? How would it manifest itself in the way religious people go about their lives? Is praying without seeking an answer “denying” God’s power? Is presuming you have an answer when your own desires are all you are considering perhaps also “denying” God’s power?
I reflect on how many times I’ve learned something surprising, unanticipated, or which had never before entered into my mind. I think, too, about Joseph’s comment before his First Vision that “it had never entered into [his] heart that all were wrong” (JS-H 1: 18), but the answer from God informed him otherwise. God’s answers are quite often:
-unanticipated;
-never something you would have considered;
-inconvenient;
-requiring of you something you would prefer not to give or do;
-clear and unequivocal;
-enough to make your frame shake as it penetrates to your soul.
When prayer gets through to God and provokes an answer from Him, it is offered with a sincere heart, having real intent. (Moroni 10: 4; James 1: 5.) If a prayer is offered without a sincere heart, and while lacking real intent, is this “denying” the power of God?
If a minister lacks real intent, and does not go to God in mighty prayer, has never become acquainted with the “power of God,” but proceeds to teach with their own learning anyway, do they deny the power of God?
In place of preaching what the Lord reveals, men will claim they teach correct “precepts.” They have all the revelation they need, and they are now proceeding with the authority given them by God. But they don’t hear from Him, don’t have new revelation to deliver from Him, and do not expect God to be involved any longer.
In effect, God has become so distant that “there is no God today.” He finished His work. He’s given His authority to men.
Whether the claim is based on Protestant claims that authority is derived from the New Testament, and all men who believe have authority from God, or it is a Catholic claim to have a line of authority back to Jesus Christ, it is the same. Without some involvement from God in the church itself, the teachings end in the same conclusion: “God has given His power unto men.” The institution has taken over. The claim is always that “the church is true” without regard to whether the Lord remains involved, revealing Himself to the church. This is what the Catholic Church has claimed for centuries God has finished His work and surrendered the “keys of authority” to the church. Now God has transmuted into a church, a Holy Roman Church, to which you may confess your sins, obtain absolution for your sins, and have entry into heaven provided to you.
With such a claim, why ask God for help? Why turn to a priesthood advancing such claims? Why make the difficult, inner changes that bring about real intent and faith in Christ? Why seek for and come into contact with “the power of God” if a church can be an adequate substitute?
How like the Catholics have we become?
Was Nephi only warning about Catholic error? Do his warnings apply equally to all?
I love this post!
Well, this post was a revelation from God! So I guess I’m still in contact with Him! :)
-unanticipated;
-never something you would have considered;
-inconvenient;
-requiring of you something you would prefer not to give or do;
-clear and unequivocal;
-enough to make your frame shake as it penetrates to your soul.
I’ve been saying for a long time that we have become just like the Catholic Church in that the general population seems to worship the leadership of the church. I admire, respect and take counsel from the leadership, but my worship only belongs to God the Father, and our Savior, Jesus Christ. I am in a unique position in that I have many friends who are of other faiths. I am astounded at their faith and love for the Savior. They do not live their religion only on Sunday but “witness” him to all that they meet. They are not ashamed to talk of and about him in any place. He, our Creator, is the topic of most of their conversations. We as LDS do not have the monopoloy on faith, good works, miracles (when was the last time you saw a miracle?). In fact it seems that other denominations are now preaching exactly what Joseph experienced … angels do come and minister, Jesus does come and visit, and you can be taken to the Throne of God. So many of other faiths are having incredible spiritual experiences. A chorister in my friend’s LDS ward stood up bravely and bore her testimony that we LDS have lost the Praise, rejoice and worship of our Lord and Savior in our singing in sacrament meetings. She goes to sacrament meeting and then goes to another denomination to sing and give praise and rejoice in the Lord. Is that wrong? The minister knows of her devotion and love of the gospel and she bears testimony all the time of Joseph Smith and the BOM to others in his congregation. He is a good man who is not threatened by her belief. I think it is absolutely wonderful that the Lord is gathering those who love him and worship him of all denominations … The only thing that we have that other denominations do not have are the temple ordinances. Yet what good do they do us if they do not lead us to the feet of our Savior?
Another wake up call from the Lord via D.
I ran across this quote by Joseph. Seems very appropriate.
Joseph Smith warned: “I say to you [and what I say to you I say to all] hear the warning voice of God, lest Zion fall, and the Lord swear in His wrath the inhabitants of Zion shall not enter into His rest. (HC I p. 316)
J.